This plan is the second phase of the IAASB’s efforts to monitor the implementation of clarified ISAs. The review is focused on whether these standards are being consistently understood and implemented in a way that achieves the IAASB’s goals in revising and redrafting them. Recognizing the broad range of stakeholders that may be interested in providing feedback to the IAASB about the clarified ISAs and their implementation, the IAASB encourages and welcomes input from all interested parties for the purpose of the review.

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) today released for exposure  Proposed Changes to the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants Related to Provisions Addressing a Breach of a Requirement of the Code. The IESBA believes that any breach of a provision of the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code) should be treated as a matter of utmost importance. Therefore, the IESBA has proposed changes to the IESBA Code that will provide guidance to a professional accountant on the action to be taken in such situations. This includes a robust framework for addressing a breach of an independence requirement that will result in greater transparency. This Exposure Draft is the result of a project that commenced in 2010.*

The proposed changes to the IESBA Code include a requirement that a professional accountant take whatever actions that might be available as soon as possible to satisfactorily address the consequences of a breach of a provision of the Code.  For a breach of an independence requirement in the IESBA Code, a detailed framework is provided setting out the action to be taken. Specifically, the proposed changes would require a firm to:

• terminate, suspend, or eliminate the interest or relationship that caused the breach;
• evaluate the significance of the breach and determine whether action can be taken to satisfactorily address the consequences of the breach;
• communicate all breaches with those charged with governance and obtain their agreement with the proposed course of action; and
• document the actions taken and all the matters discussed with those charged with governance and, if applicable, any relevant regulators.

“The proposed changes to the IESBA Code should help to ensure that the significance of any breach of an independence requirement is discussed with those charged with governance, and that professional judgment is taken into account when taking action,” stated Ken Dakdduk, IESBA Chair. “An auditor resignation due to an independence violation—regardless of the magnitude of the violation—has potential consequences to the company, its investors, and the capital markets.  The proposed framework will guide accountants, and those charged with governance, in determining whether resignation is an appropriate outcome or whether a different outcome can be supported. In addition, disclosure will enhance transparency, and the proposed documentation requirement adds a degree of rigor to the process that will be very useful.”

How to Comment
The IESBA invites all stakeholders to comment on its proposals. To access the exposure draft and submit a comment, visit the IESBA’s website at www.ifac.org/Ethics/publications-resources. Comments on the exposure draft are requested by January 23, 2012.

*Note to Editors:
In 2010, the IESBA assessed the provisions in the IESBA Code that address a breach of an independence requirement, and concluded that a project should be undertaken to reconsider those provisions, including determining whether the provisions are needed and, if so, how the guidance can be enhanced with regard to scope and application. As a result of this project, the IESBA concluded that it is in the public interest to have an appropriate mechanism that can be consistently applied across all jurisdictions in order to provide companies, auditors, regulators, and similar authorities with a framework to evaluate the impact of an independence violation and determine whether the auditor's resignation is the only appropriate outcome.

About the IESBA
The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is an independent standard-setting board that develops and issues, in the public interest, high-quality ethical standards and other pronouncements for professional accountants worldwide. Through its activities, the IESBA develops the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, which establishes ethical requirements for professional accountants. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IESBA are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession, dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. It is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#       #       #

The IPSASB has approved the Consultation Paper Reporting Service Performance Information. The IPSASB considers that reporting service performance information is necessary to meet the objectives of financial reporting, which are to provide information that is useful to users of General Purpose Financial Reports (GPFR) for accountability and decision making. This project aims to present a principles-based approach to developing a consistent framework for public sector entities.

IPSASB Chair Andreas Bergmann stressed, “Service performance information is essential for accountability for the efficient and effective use of resources, service provision, and achievement public sector entities’ objectives. Service performance reporting can provide financial and non-financial, as well as quantitative and qualitative, information about the achievement of service delivery objectives in the current reporting period, as well as anticipated future service delivery activities and resource needs.”

Various public sector entities around the world currently report service performance information. In practice, such reporting is diverse. The objective of the IPSASB’s service performance information project has been to improve the consistency and comparability of such information across jurisdictions and between entities.

Overall, the Consultation Paper proposes a framework for reporting service performance information. The framework includes information on the scope of the service performance information reported, the public sector entity’s objectives, the achievement of those objectives, and a narrative discussion of the achievement of all the objectives. The Consultation Paper also proposes a standardized service performance information terminology and working definitions to enhance users’ understanding of service performance information reported as outlined in the proposed framework.

The Consultation Paper is available to download free of charge from the IPSASB website (www.ipsasb.org). The IPSASB encourages IFAC members, associates, and regional accountancy bodies to promote the availability of this consultation paper to their members and employees.  

About the IPSASB
The IPSASB develops accounting standards and guidance for use by public sector entities. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IPSASB are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession, dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. It is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#    #    #

The International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) has published Exposure Draft (ED) 46, Recommended Practice Guideline. This ED builds on a consultation paper issued in late 2009. ED 46 provides good practice guidelines on reporting on the long-term fiscal sustainability of a public sector entity, and particularly emphasizes that entities may be able to draw on projections that are already being made by other bodies, thereby ensuring a cost-effective approach.

The sovereign debt crisis has emphasized the significance of the fiscal condition of governments and other public sector entities to the global economy. There have been heightened concerns about the ability of governments to meet debt servicing obligations and the extent to which they can maintain current policies and meet current and future obligations related to entitlement programs, without raising taxes and contributions or increasing debt to unsustainable levels.

These concerns have emphasized the importance of providing projections of inflows and outflows of resources over the longer term, together with narrative explanations of the main risks facing governments and other public sector entities. This information allows the users of general purpose financial reports to assess the extent to which current policies are sustainable, and complements the financial statements, which remain at the core of public sector financial reporting.

“The continuing volatility in the world’s financial markets has reinforced the IPSASB’s conviction that  financial statements alone cannot provide all the information necessary to enable citizens, investors, and other users to evaluate the long-term fiscal sustainability of governments and public sector entities,” explained Andreas Bergmann, chair of the IPSASB. “ED 46 aims to provide straightforward guidance to entities to ensure that information on their fiscal sustainability is complete, relevant, and understandable. I encourage our constituents to give this ED full consideration, provide feedback, and assess the need to report on the long-term sustainability of their finances.”

This IPSASB project has continued to benefit greatly from the oversight of a Task Force with a wide membership, including standard setters with experience reporting on long-term fiscal sustainability, governments that have many years’ experience reporting on long-term fiscal sustainability, and supranational organizations, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union.

ED 46 is available to download free of charge from the IFAC website (www.ipsasb.org). The IPSASB encourages IFAC members, associates, and regional accountancy bodies to promote the availability of this Exposure Draft to their members and employees.  

About the IPSASB
The IPSASB develops accounting standards and guidance for use by public sector entities. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IPSASB are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession, dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. It is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#          #          #

The 2011-2012 IESBA Strategy and Work Plan, which sets the direction and priorities for the activities of the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA), has been approved by the IESBA, the IESBA Consultative Advisory Group, and the Public Interest Oversight Board.  The IESBA plans to build upon the strong base established by the revised Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (the IESBA Code) issued in July 2009. The 2011-2012 Strategy and Work Plan is focused on three strategic areas: development of standards; adoption and implementation; and convergence.

The IESBA plans to develop additional guidance for professional accountants on identifying and addressing a conflict of interest, responding to suspected illegal acts, and dealing with a breach of an independence requirement of the IESBA Code. The IESBA will also consider recommendations of an IESBA Working Group tasked with reporting on the unique and challenging issues faced by professional accountants in small- and medium-sized entities and small- and medium-sized practices in complying with the IESBA Code.

“The 2011-2012 Strategy and Work Plan reflects the IESBA’s commitment to serve the public interest by setting high-quality ethical standards for professional accountants,” said Ken Dakdduk, IESBA Chair. “This commitment is also demonstrated by facilitating the convergence of international and national ethical standards, including auditor independence requirements, through the development of a robust, internationally appropriate code of ethics.”

To determine the best course of action for furthering its objective of achieving convergence of the IESBA Code and national standards and regulations, the IESBA will also consider input from regulators and national standard setters and compare key provisions in the IESBA Code to the standards and regulations of select jurisdictions.

Please visit www.ifac.org/Ethics to access the plan or to learn more about the IESBA.

About the IESBA
The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is an independent standard-setting board that develops and issues, in the public interest, high-quality ethical standards and other pronouncements for professional accountants worldwide. Through its activities, the IESBA develops the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, which establishes ethical requirements for professional accountants. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IESBA are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession, dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. It is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

 #       #       #

International network of accounting firms Baker Tilly International Limited and Nexia International have been admitted as full members of the Forum of Firms (Forum), after confirmation that they have met the Forum's membership standards. This includes reporting that they have implemented a globally coordinated quality assurance program, have policies and methodologies based on the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs), and have met other specific requirements of the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants.

Twenty-two other international networks of accounting firms are also full members of the Forum of Firms and continue to report their adherence to the Forum's membership obligations. A list of the Forum's members is available at www.ForumofFirms.org.

The Forum of Firms is an association that brings together international networks of accounting firms that perform audits of financial statements that are or may be used across national borders. The Forum's goal is to promote consistent and high-quality standards of financial reporting and auditing practices worldwide.

“We are delighted at having Baker Tilly and Nexia join the Forum and their public commitment to International Standards on Auditing and rigorous quality control standards,” says Robert Dohrer, chair of the Forum of Firms. “With the addition of Baker Tilly and Nexia, three major networks have committed in 2011 to the Forum’s international standards quality benchmark—all 24 Forum members have an important role to play in contributing to public confidence in the accountancy profession and in financial reporting in general.”

In order to achieve full membership status, Baker Tilly International Limited and Nexia International had to commit to meeting the Forum's membership obligations, which require members to:

• maintain appropriate quality control standards in accordance with International Standards on Quality Control issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), in addition to relevant national quality control standards and conduct, to the extent not prohibited by national regulation, regular globally coordinated internal quality assurance reviews;
• have policies and methodologies for the conduct of transnational audits that are based, to the extent practicable, on ISAs issued by the IAASB; and
• have policies and methodologies that conform to the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ (IESBA) Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants and national codes of ethics.

For additional details on the Forum of Firms, please visit: www.ForumofFirms.org.

About the Forum of Firms
The Forum of Firms is an association of networks of international accounting firms that perform transnational audits. Members of the Forum have committed to adhere to and promote the consistent application of high-quality audit practices worldwide, including the use of International Standards on Auditing, and the maintenance of appropriate quality control standards in accordance with International Standards on Quality Control issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. Through their organizations, members also conduct globally coordinated internal quality assurance reviews on a regular basis and have policies and methodologies that conform to the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants. The Transnational Auditors Committee is the Executive Committee of the Forum of Firms and a committee of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#   #   #

The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) is pleased to provide a series of recommendations for consideration by the G-20 at its meeting on November 3-4, 2011 in Cannes, France.