Skip to main content
  • A Time to Rise Collectively to the Challenge and Restore Confidence

    Tom Seidenstein
    Chair, International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
    Institute of Chartered Accountants of India’s Virtual Conference
    English

    Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Reporting and Assurance

    Good morning from the Washington, DC, area, in the United States. I am honored to be invited to speak today. I thank the Institute and its leadership for organizing this conference. I greatly appreciate your efforts to galvanize the profession in its response to this truly global crisis. I look forward to hearing the remarks of the distinguished panelists.

    My name is Tom Seidenstein, and I currently serve as chair of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (the IAASB). I am sorry that my first formal interaction with the Indian Institute in my current role is under these circumstances. My hope is that in the not-so-distant future, we could meet in person, in much better times. For now, please accept my best wishes for the health and well-being of those attending the conference virtually, your families, and the broader communities in which you live and serve.

    When I joined the IAASB nine months, I accepted this role with a core belief. Setting standards at the international level is the most effective way to respond to the relentless globalization of business and avoid the economic costs and regulatory arbitrage that come with a fragmentation in rules. Global approaches to global challenges. My belief in the value of global approaches remains firm. Of course, COVID-19 has created a global crisis, and the economy has been a major casualty.

    In the brief time allocated to me, my remarks will focus on three areas:

    • First, working together on both national and international levels, standard-setters, regulators, accounting and audit practitioners, preparers, and other stakeholders can make a meaningful difference in helping the economy get back on its feet.
    • Second, the IAASB stands ready to support the public interest and the external reporting community. We will create targeted guidance, where appropriate, adapt our ways of working to be flexible to rapidly changing circumstances, and coordinate with key parties.
    • Third, a few areas of our standards merit special consideration by the profession. These include going concern, auditor reporting, and auditing estimates.

    Rising to the challenge and Restoring Confidence

    I am sure that at some point this crisis will become very personal for everyone. Maybe it will be the favorite local business that needs to shut its doors. Or maybe the neighbor who loses her job. Or a friend that sadly catches the virus. I am certain that we will all be touched.

    I have been inspired by how people are responding to the crisis. It seems as if we are trying to do the best to help. I am here to say that all involved with the world of accounting and auditing have an important role to play.

    This is not the challenge that I imagined facing in my first year. However, it is the one that we collectively face, and together we should rise to meet it.

    Now more than ever, we need confidence to return in order to enable capital to flow freely again and the economy to grow. Where we sit, it is sometimes easy to get lost in the technicalities of accounting and standard setting.  However, at its best, the profession can play a critical role in ensuring trust and confidence in markets.

    Auditors are responding by adapting their ways of working and utilizing remote techniques and technology. It is no time to relax the commitment to the public interest. For the profession, this means adhering to the highest ethical standards, communicating intensively with preparers and those charged with governance, and applying both professional judgment and skepticism.

    I often say that the financial reporting world works in a highly connected ecosystem. Preparers of financial information, standard-setters, and regulators also need to each perform their role for the system to work. A weakness in any one part of the reporting ecosystem will have reverberations throughout.

    Standard setters and regulators are adapting. We do so with the recognition that we are operating in a period of enormous uncertainty, and that all judgments, even if appropriately reasoned, documented, and communicated, will not always be right in hindsight. However, we can do our best to provide greater guidance, when possible, to those trying their best to comply with our standards and rules. Standard setters need to exhibit a sense of flexibility in terms of our work program priorities and imposing additional requirements on our stakeholders.

    IAASB Standard-Setting Response: Calibrating, Reacting Agility, and Coordinating

    We at the IAASB are trying to practice what we preach. Our response is three-pronged:

    1. We are calibrating our existing program to prioritize our COVID-19 response and other leading public interest issues on our work plan, including our Quality Management work, Going Concern and Fraud, and efforts aimed at reducing complexity for Less Complex Entities. I will discuss some of our specific COVID-19 guidance shortly.
    2. We are embracing technology, as others are, to advance these priority projects and will be appropriately flexible when it comes to our previous agreed timelines. For example, we are about to publish our Exposure Draft on Group Audits. We have already agreed to an extended comment period. At our upcoming meeting in June, to be conducted via videoconference, we will discuss the impact of the current crisis on other work and effective dates.
    3. We are coordinating with national audit standard-setters, securities regulators, independent audit regulators, the International Accounting Standards Board, and professional bodies, particularly via IFAC. Our aim is to share information and discuss how we are individually responding to the crisis. We are successfully identifying areas where more work is needed and hoping to avoid redundant or confusing efforts.

    Areas of IAASB Focus to Help

    A minute earlier, I mentioned that the IAASB is developing guidance in the form of Staff Alerts to help the profession to better apply our standards. These Staff Alerts do not change the requirements of the standards. The Alerts highlight specific areas of focus under the current environment. The IAASB has already published, on its Website, a general Staff Alert aimed at broader considerations. We are developing five more on Going Concern, Auditor Reporting, the Audit of Accounting Estimates, special considerations for public sector auditors, and subsequent events.

    Let me touch on Going Concern, Auditor Reporting, and Audit of Accounting Estimates and give you a preview on what we expect to cover in our upcoming Staff Alerts. These three areas are the topics that come up most in my discussions. First, we believe our principles-based standards are robust enough to be adapted to the current environment, where there is a focus on uncertainty and judgment. We also need to keep in context the responsibilities of auditors (vis-à-vis the responsibilities of management) – neither of which is easy in these uncertain and unknown times.

    In terms of going concern, our focus is on the auditor’s understanding of management’s process for meeting the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework. That understanding will help the auditor determine whether what management’s presentation of the financial information in the financial statement is fine, whether highlighting something in the auditor’s report is needed, or whether further modification (such as a qualification or a disclaimer) is required.

    We know in many instances this will be challenging, particularly where it is a ‘close call.’ We cannot mandate when modifications to the auditor’s report may or may not be needed (the standards set out what needs to be done). We do encourage a heightened sense of professional skepticism when undertaking this work.

    Auditors can use Auditor Reporting as another way to enhance confidence in external reporting, including in areas such as going concern. Our standards set out circumstances when an emphasis of matter is needed or another modification, including qualification, disclaimer, or an adverse opinion. There may be considerably more circumstances now where modification may be needed. In-ki alluded to various scenarios where there may be issues around gathering audit evidence. In some cases, alternative procedures may provide what is needed; in other cases, the auditor may need to consider the impact on the auditor’s report.

    Disclosure by management takes on ever increasing importance in these unprecedented times. While it will depend on the circumstances, I expect that users would expect increasing transparency related to current business risks and mitigation strategies. These disclosures will also support the work of auditors. Auditors should then focus on the relevant requirements in the financial reporting standards to ensure that appropriate and necessary disclosures are made and their impact on the auditor’s report. One area to provide further transparency is Key Audit Matters (KAMs) where they are used under ISAs. Particularly for listed companies, KAMs may play an important role in enhancing the information of the auditor’s report relating to matter that, although resolved, required significant auditor attention. KAMs may also be a useful way of highlighting some of the uncertainty and judgment needed by the auditor.

    Finally, we expect the audit of accounting estimates to become even more important over the coming months. The IAASB cannot emphasize enough the need for a heightened professional skepticism when auditing accounting estimates. Our newly revised ISA 540 helps the auditor home in on those specific inherent risks attached to estimation uncertainty. The standards and our forthcoming guidance also highlight other inherent risk factors that need to be considered, even more so now. The reality is that last year’s approach may not work for the current circumstances. We expect disclosures of estimates to be a focus for auditors, as is the testing of controls.

    Towards Better, More Confident Days

    I have outlined the IAASB’s initial response to the crisis. I say initial response, because I know that there will be twist and turns. Through our coordination efforts, we know that we will need to adapt. However, I wish to convey that the IAASB is ready to play its role in helping to rebuild confidence in the global economy. The coming days, weeks, and maybe even months will inevitably be challenging. I am pleased that we stand well positioned to do our small part.

    Remarks by IAASB Chair Tom Seidenstein

  • Spotlight on IAASB's Future Projects and Priorities. A Discussion with the IAASB Chair And Deputy Chair. Part 2

    English

    In the second video in the series, Chair of the IAASB, Tom Seidenstein and Deputy Chair, Fiona Campbell discuss the scalability of audit standards, the challenges for small and medium firms and SME audits, and overall complexity of standards, all of which are the focus of the IAASB’s ‘Audits of Less Complex Entities’ working group.

    Courtesy of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand

  • IAASB Releases Conforming Amendments That Align International Standards More Closely with the Revised IESBA Code

    English

    The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) today released conforming amendments to the IAASB’s International Standards as a result of the recently restructured and revised International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ (IESBA) International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (IESBA Code).

    The conforming amendments aim to align the IAASB’s International Standards with the revisions to the IESBA Code, thus ensuring that they can continue to be applied together with the IESBA Code. 

    “The IAASB and IESBA have prioritized their cooperation and coordination because many jurisdictions use both the IAASB’s International Standards and the IESBA Code. The completion and publication of these conforming amendments fulfills the public interest to ensure that the two sets of standards work in concert,” said Tom Seidenstein, Chair of the IAASB. “These conforming amendments will give jurisdictions yet another reason to adopt and implement both tools to strengthen public confidence in the global auditing and assurance profession.”

    The conforming amendments fall under the umbrella of IAASB-IESBA coordination, a strategic commitment of the two Boards to better align for enhanced connectivity and to better serve the public interest.

    “I commend the IAASB for completing this necessary project in a timely manner,” said Dr. Stavros Thomadakis, Chairperson of IESBA, adding “Our two boards are committed to seeking alignment in our standards and coordination of our standard-setting activities on issues of common concern to help serve the public interest.” 

    The conforming amendments to the IAASB’s International Standards become effective as of July 15, 2020.

    For more information click here.

    About the IAASB 

    The IAASB develops auditing and assurance standards and guidance for use by all professional accountants under a shared standard-setting process involving the Public Interest Oversight Board, which oversees the activities of the IAASB, and the IAASB Consultative Advisory Group, which provides public interest input into the development of the standards and guidance. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IAASB are facilitated by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). For copyright, trademark, and permissions information, please go to permissions or contact permissions@ifac.org.

     

  • Conforming Amendments to the IAASB International Standards as a Result of the Revised IESBA Code

    The Conforming Amendments to the IAASB’s International Standards as a Result of the Revised IESBA Code, propose limited amendments to the IAASB’s International Standards in response to the revised International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (IESBA Code). The Conforming Amendments are intended to ensure that the IAASB International Standards can continue to be applied together with the IESBA Code.

    IAASB
    English
  • Spotlight on IAASB Future Projects and Priorities - a discussion with the IAASB Chair and Deputy Chair

    English

    On a recent outreach trip to Australia and New Zealand, IAASB Chair, Tom Seidenstein and IAASB Deputy Chair, Fiona Campbell sat down with Amir Ghandar from CA ANZ to discuss the future of standard setting, embracing agile-standard setting and the board’s focus on keeping trust in its audit product. This is the first in a series of four interview videos conducted by CA ANZ.

    Courtesy of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand

  • IAASB Enhances ISRS 4400 to Respond to Evolving Needs of Stakeholders

    English

    The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) today released International Standard on Related Services (ISRS) 4400 (Revised), its revised standard for performing agreed-upon procedures engagements.

    In an agreed-upon procedures engagement, the practitioner performs the procedures that have been agreed upon by the practitioner and the engaging party, and the practitioner communicates those procedures and the related findings in the agreed-upon procedures report. A wide range of stakeholders use agreed-upon procedures reports for a variety of reasons; for example, regulators, funding bodies, creditors and others ask for agreed-upon procedures reports to support or complement information, such as audited financial statements or loan or grant applications.

    “Agreed-upon procedures engagements are widely used in many jurisdictions and the demand for such engagements continues to grow, particularly in relation to the need for increased accountability around funding and grants,” said Tom Seidenstein, IAASB chair. “This revised standard is responsive to such trends, relating to both financial and non-financial subject matters, and the enhancements in the requirements and application material will promote consistency in the interpretation and performance of agreed-upon procedures engagements by practitioners.”

    In addition to having been redrafted using the clarity drafting conventions to be consistent with other IAASB International Standards, some of the significant enhancements to ISRS 4400 (Revised), Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements, include:

    • Responding to the needs of stakeholders – Broadening the scope of the standard to meet demand for agreed-upon procedures engagements and introducing requirements and application material to address evolving engagement circumstances, such as the use of a practitioner’s expert in an agreed-upon procedures engagement.
    • Providing transparency in the AUP report – Introducing requirements and application material to clarify whether or not the practitioner is required to comply with independence requirements and, if so, the determination and disclosure of the relevant independence requirements.
    • Enhancing consistency in the performance of AUP engagements – Clarifying how professional judgment is exercised in an agreed-upon procedures engagement and introducing requirements and application material on engagement acceptance and continuance conditions and documentation.

    ISRS 4400 (Revised) will be effective for AUP engagements for which the terms of engagement are agreed on or after January 1, 2022.

    The IAASB also released an ISRS 4400 (Revised) Fact Sheet to provide implementation support in relation to the more significant changes to the standard and to help practitioners navigate and apply the revised standard. Please visit the IAASB website.  

    About the IAASB

    The IAASB develops auditing and assurance standards and guidance for use by all professional accountants under a shared standard-setting process involving the Public Interest Oversight Board, which oversees the activities of the IAASB, and the IAASB Consultative Advisory Group, which provides public interest input into the development of the standards and guidance. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IAASB are facilitated by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). For copyright, trademark, and permissions information, please go to permissions or contact permissions@ifac.org.

     

  • International Standard on Related Services (ISRS) 4400 (Revised)

    ISRS 4400 (Revised), Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements, has been revised to respond to the growing demand for these engagements, particularly in relation to the need for increased accountability around funding and grants. A broad range of stakeholders, such as regulators, funding bodies and creditors, use agreed-upon procedures reports for a variety of reasons.

    IAASB
    English