The International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board opened a global consultation asking for input on a proposal for a sustainability reporting framework for the public sector, echoing recent moves in the private sector.
The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is reminding stakeholders and encouraging the public to act soon and submit comments on their two open exposure drafts.
The Proposed Revisions to the Code Relating to the Definition of Engagement Team and Group Audits establish provisions that comprehensively address independence considerations for firms and individuals involved in an engagement to perform an audit of group financial statements. The exposure draft landing page linked above includes a webinar explaining the proposed revisions.
Comments are requested by May 31, 2022.
The Proposed Technology-related Revisions to the Code seeks to enhance the Code’s robustness and expand its relevance in an environment being reshaped by rapid technological advancements. The proposed amendments will guide the ethical mindset and behavior of professional accountants in business and in public practice as they deal with changes brought by technology in their work processes and the content of the services they provide. The exposure draft landing page linked above includes a webinar explaining the proposed revisions.
Comments are requested by June 20, 2022. (For stakeholders who are unable to submit a formal response, an online survey has been created for the Tech ED.)
Public input is a critical component of the standards setting process. The IESBA encourages all stakeholders to comment on both important exposure drafts. Learn more about the IESBA at www.ethicsboard.org
The accounting profession is undergoing a reexamination of its efforts to address the lack of diversity, not only in the U.S. but in other parts of the world.
Last month, the Institute of Management Accountants, the California Society of CPAs and the International Federation of Accountants released a...
“Considerable advances have been made in recent years to strengthen the International Independence Standards, further reinforcing the important role of the independent audit to the integrity of financial markets worldwide,” said IESBA Chair Gabriela Figueiredo Dias. “This timely benchmarking analysis answers many questions we have received and provides much insight into how the provisions in the Code compare with those of a major jurisdiction like the U.S., and will ultimately instill greater public confidence in the robustness of the Code.”
The IESBA launched the benchmarking study to promote awareness and further adoption of the Code. Without making judgments as to the relative merits of the two independence frameworks, the report highlights the similarities and key differences between the Code and the U.S. SEC and PCAOB rules in areas of greatest interest to stakeholders, including the permissibility of non-assurance services to audit clients, fees, long association with an audit client, and business and financial relationships. The IESBA will consider the findings of the benchmarking analysis in developing its 2024-2027 Strategy and Work Plan.
Alongside the detailed report, the IESBA Staff has published an abridged report that provides an overview of the main similarities and differences, as well as an additional publication with further information on the background and objectives of the initiative.
