The PAIB Committee's survey on risk management and internal control received over 600 responses from around the globe. This information paper provides an analysis of the survey results and summarizes respondents' recommendations for the next steps in this area.

Risk management and internal control frameworks, standards, and/or guidance should be aligned internationally, according to the results of the Risk Management and Internal Control Survey released by the IFAC Professional Accountants in Business (PAIB) Committee. With over 600 responses from around the globe and from all types of organizations, the survey results also highlighted that:

• risk management and internal control systems should be better integrated into the governance, strategy, and operations of organizations; and
• risk management and internal control guidelines should be combined into a set of integrated guidelines, as both elements are integral parts of an effective governance framework.

As many organizations have international activities, further international alignment of risk management and internal control guidelines would benefit their operations and compliance processes, reducing costs and allowing for the comparison of these systems across borders and, thus, increasing investor confidence.

Recommended Next Steps
Respondents recommend that national and international standard-setting bodies and professional associations, as well as the relevant regulators, collaborate to (a) determine the major similarities and differences between the various guidelines, (b) compile leading risk management and internal control practices, and (c) consider the benefits of further integration and international alignment of regulations and guidelines in the area of governance, risk management, and internal control. Respondents would like to see these discussions lead to the establishment of an international, integrated framework. To further international alignment, existing national guidelines could be expanded or modified—with allowances made for specific national circumstances—to meet the principles of an international framework.

The survey analysis, Global Survey on Risk Management and Internal Control—Results, Analysis, and Proposed Next Steps, is available at http://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/global-survey-risk-management-and-internal-control.

About the PAIB Committee
The PAIB Committee (www.ifac.org/paib) serves IFAC member bodies and the more than one million professional accountants worldwide who work in commerce, industry, financial services, the public sector, education, and the not-for-profit sector. Its aim is to promote and contribute to the value of professional accountants in business by increasing awareness of the important roles professional accountants play, supporting member bodies in enhancing the competence of their members, and facilitating the communication and sharing of good practices and ideas.

About IFAC
IFAC (www.ifac.org) is the global organization for the accountancy profession, dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. It is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

The Professional Accountancy Organization (PAO) Development Committee of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) has issued a revised edition of its Good Practice Guide, Establishing and Developing a Professional Accountancy Body (the Guide), which was first released in 2005 and updated in 2007 to support professional accountancy organizations in expanding and strengthening their role and responsibilities in representing the accountancy profession.

The structure of the Guide, enhanced and simplified from the original version, is now organized in two sections: Establishing and Developing a Professional Accountancy Body, which covers the roles and responsibilities of a professional accountancy organization, education and examinations, and capacity development; and Tools and Resources to Support the Development of the Accounting Profession, which includes new case studies, practical illustrations, and supplementary guidance.

PAO Development Committee Chairwoman Deborah Williams noted, “Building on the hard work undertaken by the former Developing Nations Committee, we are very pleased to release a completely revised and updated Good Practice Guide as our first PAO Development Committee publication, which was written in response to demand from the developing profession. Strengthening professional accountancy organizations is an essential element of developing financial infrastructures, which in turn assists in achieving financial stability. Our committee and the guidance it provides helps newer professional accountancy organizations, and all of their development partners, along the path to building an effective, sustainable profession.”

The Guide should be a valuable resource for individuals and organizations involved in building the capacity of the accountancy profession, IFAC members and associates seeking further development, and other organizations involved in the regulation of accounting and auditing activities. While primarily aimed at building the capacity of the profession in emerging countries, the guide will also be useful for more developed professional accountancy organizations considering revisions to governance structures, the development of education programs, and the adoption and implementation of international standards.

This revised edition includes the following additions:

• Further guidance on enhancing public sector focus
• Expanded information about the IFAC Statements of Membership Obligations (SMOs)
• Sample Action Plans on quality assurance, and adoption and implementation of international standards
• Guidance on strengthening governance

In addition, the guide was developed in the English language with plans for translation into Arabic, French, Russian, and Spanish by December 2011.

Establishing and Developing a Professional Accountancy Body can be downloaded free of charge from the IFAC website.

About IFAC
IFAC (www.ifac.org) is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

The effects of the financial crisis continue to be felt by small businesses, according to the small- and medium-sized accountancy practitioners recently polled by the International Federation of Accountants. Economic uncertainty is still the biggest challenge facing small- and medium-sized entities (SMEs), said the largest group of respondents—nearly 30%—while the burden of regulation was a close second. Regulations and standards challenge small- and medium-sized accounting practices (SMPs) as well: over 40% said that keeping up with regulations and standards is the most important issue now facing their practice.

Despite the prevalence of economic uncertainty, nearly 40% of SMPs expect their practices to perform better this year than last year. Only slightly more (43%) expect business to be even with 2010, and 19% expect business to shrink in 2011.

SMPs continue to generate the largest proportion of their revenue from traditional compliance-based services. Nearly 45% of respondents indicated that audit and assurance is their biggest source of revenue, followed closely by accounting and compilation (40%). Tax and advisory/consulting services comprised only 15% combined.

With the aim of taking a snapshot of the key issues confronted by SMPs and their SME clients, the IFAC SMP Quick Poll will be issued quarterly throughout 2011 in the SMP eNews, IFAC’s free newsletter for SMPs. The first Quick Poll collected 425 responses from all regions of the world over a 14-day period (January 27, 2011 to February 9, 2011). To subscribe to the SMP eNews, and participate in our next poll, sign up here.

IFAC wishes to thank those member bodies and regional organizations that published the poll in their newsletters, or otherwise helped promote it. The full survey results are available here.

About IFAC
IFAC (www.ifac.org) is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

To support professional accountancy organizations in expanding and strengthening their role and responsibilities in representing the accountancy profession, the PAO Development Committee Good Practice Guide Part 1, Establishing and Developing a Professional Accountancy Body which covers the roles and responsibilities of a professional accountancy organization, education and examinations, and capacity development; and Good Practice Guide Part 2, Tools and Resources to Support the Development of the Accounting Profession, which includes new case studies, practical illustrati

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) today released for public comment a discussion paper exploring key issues relating to disclosures in financial statements. Titled The Evolving Nature of Financial Reporting: Disclosure and Its Audit Implications, the paper highlights recent trends in the range, volume, and complexity of financial statement disclosures, and explores issues and practical challenges in preparing, auditing, and using them. In addition, in order to stimulate further debate on audit quality, and in its continuing efforts to facilitate robust audits in the public interest, the IAASB today also released a publication titled Audit Quality: An IAASB Perspective.

Financial Statement Disclosures
“Over the past several years, we have witnessed a transformation in the nature and extent of disclosures; for example, it is now common to see disclosures that are more forward-looking or qualitative,” noted Prof. Arnold Schilder, IAASB chairman. He added, “Such disclosures are critical—as one investor said to me, ‘We care more about the “soft stuff.”’ This development, however, raises important issues and challenges for preparers and auditors alike. Through this discussion paper, the IAASB seeks to better understand different viewpoints on a range of issues about financial statement disclosure practices, as well as the implications from an auditing perspective.”

The discussion paper addresses critical issues such as challenges in preparing disclosures, the nature and extent of evidence for different types of disclosures, and the application of the concept of materiality to disclosures. Views from all stakeholders are sought, and the discussion paper asks specific questions of preparers; investors, lenders, and other creditors; regulators; and auditors. A consultation period of over four months has been provided to enable stakeholders to consider the complex issues addressed in the discussion paper.

Audit Quality
“Audit quality is at the heart of the IAASB’s mandate to set high-quality auditing standards,” noted Prof. Schilder. “However, while our clarified International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) make an important contribution to audit quality worldwide, they are not the only element of audit quality. Also, it has been clear from our various stakeholder outreach efforts that there are many different perspectives on audit quality. This publication aims to help raise stakeholders’ awareness of the many different views and influences on audit quality, as well as of the complexity and multifaceted nature of audit quality.”

“The publication is intended to stimulate further thought and discussion on audit quality among stakeholders, while recognizing the importance of international consensus on audit quality matters,” explained IAASB Technical Director James Gunn. “At the same time, the IAASB recognizes that more can be done to maintain and enhance audit quality. The IAASB will continue to explore how it may do so throughout 2011 and beyond.”

How to Comment
The IAASB invites all stakeholders to comment on its proposals. To access the discussion paper on financial statement disclosures or submit a comment, visit the IAASB’s website at www.iaasb.org/ExposureDrafts.php. Comments on the discussion paper on financial statement disclosures are requested by June 1, 2011.

Perspectives on audit quality and views on key audit quality issues are welcomed by the IAASB at any time. They may be submitted in writing to one or more of the key IAASB contacts listed in the audit quality publication.

About the IAASB
The IAASB (www.iaasb.org) develops auditing and assurance standards and guidance for use by all professional accountants under a shared standard-setting process involving the Public Interest Oversight Board, which oversees the activities of the IAASB, and the IAASB Consultative Advisory Group, which provides public interest input into the development of the standards and guidance. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IAASB are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC (www.ifac.org) is the global organization for the accountancy profession, dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. It is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

This publication introduces a specific initiative of the IAASB to contribute to the debate on audit quality. It highlights several important perspectives on audit quality, as a means to stimulate thoughts and discussions amongst stakeholders in the financial reporting process. It also provides an indication of the IAASB's plans to consider pursuing a future project on audit quality.