It is an enormous pleasure and privilege for me to be able to share time with you this morning in order to discuss convergence with international standards on auditing.  President CA Ved Jain, may I start these remarks by thanking you most sincerely for the opportunity to share time with you, with your Vice President, CA Uttam Prakash Agarwal, with your fellow guests and with your members: fellow chartered accountants of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. 

May I also take this opportunity to congratulate you on your election as a member of the Board of the International Federation of Accountants, which became effective last week on 13 November 2008.  Our global profession has been illuminated by the contribution of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and its many excellent nominees to IFAC boards and committees; it will be even more brightly illuminated by your presence at its Board meetings.  Under your leadership, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India is the largest professional body of Chartered Accountants in the World, with a strong tradition of service to the public interest and to the Indian economy.  Members of your Institute are increasingly working overseas, to the benefit of the economies of the countries in which they work. 

I am particularly delighted at the MOU signed yesterday between the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and my own professional body of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.  This foreshadows a time of great development of our wonderful profession in India and the UK and of even more outstanding service to our two great nations.  May I congratulate you on your outstanding leadership of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, which will shine throughout the years ahead as a major milestone in the development of the Indian profession and the Indian economy. 

One of the epithets applied to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India is "partners in nation building."  To me, this is an excellent characterisation of the contribution of our profession of accountancy to the world.  Our profession is concerned with adding value to economies, in particular in creating an investment climate of trust.  An investment climate of trust is key to raising capital on the national and international markets.  It is key to the provision of energy, water, education, healthcare, food, and employment.  Indeed, it is key to the fight against poverty-a fight which is so important to us all.

High standards of auditing are an essential component of an investment climate of trust, and it is my firm belief that trust will be higher if all nations adopt and implement International Standards on Auditing as the standards to be followed by auditors in their own country.  I am most encouraged by the progress which has been made in India towards the adoption of International Standards on Auditing and would strongly encourage you to complete this process at the very earliest opportunity.  Indeed, I am delighted to have been told that this is your firm intention.

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. I am honored to participate in the 12^th World Congress of Accounting Historians here in Turkey. I am pleased to be back in Istanbul, which I had the pleasure of visiting in November 2006 for the 16^th World Congress of Accountants. This city is the perfect location for a global discussion centering on history and business, as this is a place where civilization and commerce have some of their deepest roots. 

I would like to extend my appreciation to Dr. Oktay Güvemli for inviting me to speak to you today.

As many of you are aware, IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession and is comprised of 157 members and associates in 123 countries and jurisdictions, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, industry, commerce, education, and government.

While IFAC itself is very young – we celebrated our 30th anniversary last year – the history of the accountancy profession stretches back centuries. The military museum where we are meeting is featuring a special exhibition on accounting from the Ottoman Empire, including documents on the Merdiban, or Stairs, method of accounting that was used as the state accounting system in the Middle East for more than 1,000 years.

The tradition of a deeply committed accountancy profession in this country continues today. I would like to acknowledge IFAC’s two member bodies here inTurkey: the Expert Accountants’ Association of Turkey and the Union of Chambers of Certified Public Accountants of Turkey. In addition, I would like to recognize and thank the two Turkish members who currently serve as IFAC volunteers: Omer Duman who is a member of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board, and Masum Turker who is a member of the Small and Medium Practices Committee.

History is important. It is important because it is a source of knowledge. History is a source for learning and a driver of evolution. If we need to understand something, we need to observe its beginning and its development.

In order to create a clear and promising path for our future, we need to consider and understand our past. History helps us understand who we are and where we are standing. We live in a time of rapid change, a time of progress, where we sometimes prefer to define ourselves in terms of where we are going, not where we come from.

But history does matter. Our view of history shapes the way we view the present, and, therefore, it contributes to our ability to find solutions for existing problems and challenges.

The writer and historian David Crabtree defines history as the facts about the past that are significant and true. This simple definition contains two words packed with meaning which must be understood in order to understand history.

The first word is “significant.” History is the process of simplifying. Of all that could be said about an event or a process, what is most important or most significant? The goal of history is to identify the knowledge about the past that best captures the essence of values, skills, passions or achievements.

And these facts have to be “true” in the sense they are well supported by research, investigation and reliable sources. History confines itself to facts, and to the relation of actual events. The dignity of history consists in describing events with truth and accuracy and in presenting human agents and their actions in an interesting and instructive form. The first element in history, therefore, is truthfulness.

Since I am not a historian, I will not talk to you today about past history. Instead, I will focus on why, I believe, today we are experiencing a very special time in the history of accounting and auditing and what the near future may hold.

I think that two significant issues are shaping the future of accounting and auditing: the achievement of convergence and the return to a principles-based approach in the development and use of professional standards. 

Global convergence

What we are witnessing around the world is a rapidly spreading affirmation that convergence to a single set of global, principles-based auditing and accounting standards is an idea whose time has come.

It is a time when convergence plays an important role, and the use of commonly accepted international standards worldwide is being recognized by everyone as a true need, as something that will contribute significantly to the proper functioning of the financial and the capital markets and, consequently, will improve the world’s economic growth and stability.

In the past year or two, many countries and jurisdictions have reached the conclusion that convergence is essential to consistent financial reporting, believing, in turn, that it fosters investments and global economic competitiveness.

One event that will undoubtedly be registered in the history of the accountancy profession as significant in 2007 is the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s adoption of rules to accept, from foreign private issuers in their filings with the Commission, financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) without reconciliation to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as used in the United States. 

No less important in our current history have been the decisions that were taken by countries like Australia, New Zealand, India, China, Canada, Brazil and others to converge with IFRSs or International Standards on Auditing.

This progress is actually not a surprise to IFAC. I am proud to tell you that IFAC was a champion of convergence long before the concept was popular and well before it was called convergence. Surely history will acknowledge IFAC’s role and contribution in this area.

IFAC is so committed to the goal of convergence that this is reflected in its mission statement. Well before many in the business community were working with a global mindset, IFAC recognized that a single set of high quality international standards is essential to raising the quality and uniformity of practice by professional accountants throughout the world.

In our early days, we referred to “harmonization” of standards but moved to the word “convergence,” because it better conveys what IFAC is working to achieve: many interested parties moving simultaneously towards the same point: the worldwide use of a consistent set of high quality professional standards.

IFAC’s four independent standard-setting boards – the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), the International Accounting Education Standards Board, International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants, and the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board – are committed to developing international standards that raise the level of practice and promote reliable and high quality financial reporting worldwide. IFAC’s commitment to convergence also includes promoting the use of the accounting standards developed by the IASB. 

In fact, IFAC showed great foresight in adhering to a global perspective back in the 1970s and 1980s, because the phenomenon of globalization was just around the corner. In the 1990s, as the world increasingly “flattened” and barriers to trade and investment collapsed, the need for a more common business language with consistently applied standards became ever more necessary. We witnessed the tripling of the global equity market value of all publicly traded securities and saw even the smallest companies begin to adopt structures that would enable them to participate and compete in the global marketplace.

While these developments presented the accountancy profession with unique challenges, the ongoing development and adoption of international standards enabled us to effectively respond and contribute to strengthening economic growth and development around the globe.

Today, support for global convergence is nearly unanimous and crosses regional, cultural and professional boundaries. The results of IFAC’s Global Leadership Survey of the leaders of professional accountancy organizations, conducted in late 2007, showed that nearly all respondents believed that convergence was key to economic growth and development in their respective countries. In responding to our survey, they ranked convergence to International Standards on Auditing (ISAs), set by the IAASB, at the same high level of importance as convergence to IFRSs set by the IASB. The respondents to the Global Leadership Survey recognized that convergence strengthens auditing and accounting standards and results in improved financial reporting, which is so critical to establishing investor confidence and to creating vibrant capital markets. 

Members of IFAC are not alone in supporting convergence.

• The World Federation of Exchanges has endorsed the IAASB’s processes for standard setting and recognizes the importance of ISAs.
• The Financial Stability Forum has identified ISAs and IFRS as two of the 12 key standards for sound financial systems and deserving of propriety implementation depending on country circumstances.
• And the World Bank uses ISAs and IFRSs as the benchmarks for its ROSCs (Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes) for assessing the quality of national auditing and accounting standards.

Convergence is a most important and, I believe, a most achievable goal and the more quickly we move on this, the greater the chance for success is. However, it is also important to be aware that there is still a long road to be traveled in order to achieve the goal of global convergence. Our aspirations should be beyond the scope of equivalence and mutual recognition and we should recognize that we have much to do to move further down the path.

IFAC’s work supporting and promoting convergence

Because IFAC understands there is much to be gained from convergence, and because developing a strong accountancy profession is central to our mission, we are working in numerous ways to support and promote adoption of high quality international standards in all countries and jurisdictions around the world. Let me briefly outline three of IFAC’s actions in this regard.

First, the IAASB’s Clarity project aims to ease the process of convergence to ISAs, making them easier to translate and to implement. Besides, this project supports the historic tendency: to achieve simplicity. The IAASB expects to complete all 35 ISAs as final standards, redrafted under the Clarity project, by the end of 2008. These standards will be effective for financial periods beginning on or after December 15, 2009. IFAC believes the Clarity project is crucial to removing any barriers to convergence to international auditing standards.

I am convinced that the Clarity Project, as its subsequent impact on the formulation of the future auditing standards, will be recognized as one of the significant milestones in the history of auditing.

IFAC also works to promote convergence through its Member Body Compliance Program. This program was established to support IFAC’s members and associates in meeting the requirements for IFAC membership, which are set out in the Statements of Membership Obligations, or SMOs. As part of the Compliance Program, IFAC members and associates completed self-evaluation questionnaires designed to assess whether and how they are complying with SMOs, which require them to promote, incorporate and assist in implementing international standards issued by IFAC’s independent standard-setting boards and the IASB, and to have in place quality assurance and investigation and discipline programs.

The Compliance Program plays a major role in contributing to the overall quality of the profession, and it does so in a way that is supportive and collaborative. Launched in November 2003, the Compliance Program is now entering the third phase, which involves member bodies and associates developing action plans based on policy recommendations provided by IFAC Compliance staff. To encourage the development of effective and responsive action plans, IFAC encourages its member bodies and associates to collaborate by sharing their experiences and offering advice in the preparation and implementation of Action Plans.

I would also like to emphasize that IFAC’s Member Body Compliance Program is an international model of transparency. All responses to the self-assessment questionnaire are posted on the IFAC website and the action plans, once agreed with the member body, will also be posted on the site. Thus, anyone in any part of the world can readily obtain information about the state of the profession in the more than 120 countries represented by IFAC members and associates.

I am absolutely convinced that the IFAC Compliance Program will remain in history as one of the most ambitious and effective programs for the development of the accounting profession and for the improvement of financial reporting systems.

Another way IFAC is working to promote international convergence is through increased dialogue with those who oversee the financial and capital markets and, for that reason, have key interests in the work of the profession. We are engaged in ongoing dialogue with international regulators and organizations, including the International Organization of Securities Commissions, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors, the European Commission, the World Bank, and the Financial Stability Forum. We also hold meetings with national regulators in countries that IFAC officers and chairs of standard-setting boards visit. Regulators also participate on the consultative advisory groups to IFAC standard-setting boards.

In recent years, IFAC has undertaken a number of reforms, including increased dialogue with regulators and other organizations, to help ensure that its standard-setting activities reflect the public interest and are fully transparent to those affected by the standards. One of the most important developments, and one that history will also highlight as a relevant event, was the establishment of the international Public Interest Oversight Board (PIOB) in March 2005 to oversee IFAC’s standard-setting activities in the areas of auditing and assurance, ethics, and education, as well as the IFAC Member Body Compliance Program. Earlier this year, the PIOB completed its first three-year term, and its continuing oversight has helped to increase confidence that IFAC’s activities are properly responsive to the public interest.

The return to principles and the search for simplicity

Along with the historic achievement of convergence, we are now also witnessing another historic process: the return to principles and the search for simplicity.

I talk about a return to principles because the standards were first created as generally accepted principles. Initially, they were the reflection of the criteria that had consensus among the professionals of a specific jurisdiction. It was that consensus that gave the standards authority. And those basic standards were expressed as general principles. These standards, on the other hand, were generated in each country, and they were strongly influenced by each culture.

It is not easy now to determine how, in a relatively short period of time, in many countries those general principles became a set of numerous and complex detailed rules.

Those who favor rules say the more specific the requirement, the more certain you can be that, for example, similar transactions are accounted for in a similar manner. Rules limit the preparer’s or auditor’s use of professional judgment and, in a litigious environment, can initially provide a sense of protection. Regulators and oversight authorities tend to like rules because they offer a specific means of measuring compliance.

On the other hand, the argument against rules is that no standard will fit all circumstances. Since the practice of auditing and accounting is a technique, not a science, it is necessary that professional accountants and auditors exercise their professional judgment. With the principles-driven approach, the standards have some requirements written into them, accompanied by guidance, that provide a framework within which the auditor or preparer uses his or her professional judgment and interprets the standard in a given circumstance.

The facts and events of our profession’s recent past seem to indicate that the concept of “principles-based standards” will be imposed. Underlying this development is the “search for simplicity,” a basic principle in the definition of criteria and the elaboration of standards.

Looking ahead, I believe we can expect principles-based standards to become the global benchmark. The world regulatory community has been endorsing IFRSs and major regulators in the world are supporting ISAs. Globally, most major economies are already using international standards or national standards based significantly on IFRSs and ISAs. 

Last year, the SEC established an advisory committee to develop recommendations on improving financial reporting in the US. In February 2008, the committee submitted a number of proposals to the SEC in a progress report; the proposals included that the Financial Accounting Standards Board move away from industry-specific guidance and instead focus on activity-based guidance. The committee also proposed that the SEC and US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board adopt frameworks for reviewing the exercise of judgment.

In this progress report, the committee recognized that detailed rules not only increase the complexity of the financial reporting system, but they also permit the structuring of transactions to achieve a particular accounting result, even if the results are inconsistent with the economic substance of the transactions or the underlying purposes of the rules.

It is truly gratifying to witness such international affirmation of principles-based standards, especially considering IFAC’s long commitment to this issue. This concept will necessarily entail an increased use of professional judgment, and this, in turn, will lead to an increase in the value of the old principle of uniformity, as a substantial requisite in the preparation and presentation of financial information.

The way forward

As the momentum for convergence and for principles-based standards continues to build and become a reality, the language of our profession becomes a truly universal one. Thus, you can see why this is a very special moment in accounting and auditing history. 

This is not to say that our work is over or that the push for convergence is a part of the past. It is, indeed, a necessary part of our future. IFAC well recognizes that additional progress needs to be made. And this additional work is required by, on the one hand, the developed economies, that have to accept being a part of an international process of standard setting and, on the other hand, by the emerging economies, where it is necessary to work intensely on the training and the guidance to effectively implement standards. All of us, including the profession here inTurkeyand around the globe, can be of assistance in this process. We must look for and identify the role we can play in helping emerging economies to strengthen the profession.

Moreover, we are only beginning this process of establishing principles-based standards and searching for simplicity. We still have a long road ahead of us.

In developing its strategy for the coming years, IFAC acknowledges that much work lies ahead in addressing issues beyond convergence and simplicity.

The accountancy profession must also continue to work to achieve greater efficiency and effectiveness and remain open to new approaches and further improvements, for example, in financial reporting. 

The quality and usability of financial reports was a key area of focus for a report that IFAC released earlier this year on the financial reporting supply chain. The report – which surveyed 340 financial reporting supply chain participants worldwide, including investors, preparers, company management and directors, auditors, standard setters, and regulators – found that the quality and strength of financial reports and financial reporting have improved in recent years as have corporate governance, the preparation of financial reports, and the audit of financial reports. But the report also emphasized that investors and other stakeholders are still finding it difficult to make sense of the figures in financial reports due to insufficient narrative reporting or qualitative information on company strategy and other areas. As a result, the recommendations for change included making the financial reporting information more understandable, increasing communication among all financial reporting supply chain participants, and including more business-driven information. 

These findings were echoed in the referred interim report of the SEC advisory committee on improving US financial reporting, which called for increasing emphasis on the investor perspective in the financial reporting system.

IFAC is already working to address these concerns, having launched a new project to analyze actions currently being taken to address the suitability of business reporting and to identify areas for future development. This project will take the findings of the financial reporting supply chain report to the next stage and deliver specific recommendations for further action in enhancing the quality and usefulness of corporate reporting.

I have often expressed my belief that the future of the accountancy profession lies in its ability to change, evolve and adapt to market demands. This includes technological demands such as XBRL, the language for the electronic communication of business and financial data.

The use of XBRL is seen as an important part of making financial reports more consistent, interactive, and useful. This view is shared by a number of regulators, including theUSSecurities and Exchange Commission, stock exchanges around the world, and national banks inBelgium,Japan,Spainand elsewhere. It is very probable that in the next few years XBRL will have a firm place in the history of accountancy.

If we act creatively in rethinking financial reporting, and in approaching many other challenges, the accountancy profession will be better equipped to sustain itself and grow. Looking to the future, we must be innovative and flexible – words, I know, that are not popularly associated with accountants. Nonetheless, we have proven we can proceed with innovation. 

To further sustain this great profession, I believe that each and every professional accountant must become its greatest advocate. We must not be shy about talking about our role in creating an investment climate of trust, of contributing to economic growth and development, and of serving as the corporate conscience for companies large and small. These are all roles that we can and should be proud of. We must let others know how they, too, can fulfill these and other roles in the international profession and provide them with the necessary training and education so that they can succeed in fulfilling them.  

Finally, as a unified global profession, we must come to agreement on strategic objectives and actions and then align our activities. We need to identify and implement mechanisms that facilitate effective communication, collaboration and consultation. And, the global profession, acting in unison, needs to address issues of new and growing importance, such as our role in environmental sustainability reporting.

Historians say that in order to consider our future, we must learn from our past. As we do this, we see that IFAC and the accountancy profession have acted as pioneers in anticipating the need for a more global business perspective. Celebrating our 30^th anniversary last year underscored our progress. Our predecessors had vision and they anticipated the future. They made the right decisions and acted upon them. IFAC was focused on convergence and principles-based standards before other organizations began to consider such issues. IFAC was one of the first organizations working to develop international standards and urging the accountancy profession to address crucial matters with a global mindset.

I believe the accountancy profession can meet the challenges and opportunities of the coming decades with a similar capacity for vision and change. Today, we continue to offer the world an example of what can be accomplished.

And if we are effective, we can make a positive difference in the world.

Thank you for your attention.

Mr. Prime Minister of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, Mr. Patrick Manning, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, dear friends.

It is a pleasure to be here with you for this 26th Annual Conference of Accountants in the Caribbean.

I would like to thank the President of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of the Caribbean (ICAC), Angela Lee Loy, and the President of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Trinidad and Tobago (ICATT), Sean Ramirez, for the invitation to speak to you today.

Let me start with a question.

Is it worth being an accountant? This is not a minor question to face for those of us who made this decision a long time ago. But it is even more important for the thousands of students who are making this decision now, and trying to determine what path they will follow. Of course, this question is also crucial for the future of our profession, because in order to have a future, our profession must be attractive to new generations. Hence, it is vital that we communicate the key role that professional accountants play in society to potential members and the wider world.

IFAC sees the accountancy profession and all professional accountants as effective agents for development in our societies. This places the accountancy profession in its true dimension, and makes the relevance and sustainability of our profession a matter of public interest.

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. It is a pleasure to be here with you for this meeting of the IOSCO Emerging Markets Committee.

IOSCO and IFAC share many common objectives, including promoting stable global capital markets, ensuring high quality financial reporting and auditing, and helping emerging nations to develop the infrastructures necessary to support sustainable long-term growth. 

Today, I would like to discuss how we can continue to collaborate to build a stronger, more stable global economy.

Let me start by pointing out that professional accountants, with their roles in all sectors of the marketplace, from auditing public companies, to working inside business and industry, in government, the not-for-profit sector, and academia, play a fundamental role in the economic growth of countries around the globe, including emerging markets. One significant area in which IFAC has worked to support professional accountants in fulfilling this role has been in promoting the adoption of a common set of high quality international accounting and auditing standards by all countries around the world.

The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), the global organization for the accountancy profession, is seeking nominations for two public member positions on the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) beginning in January 2009. Individuals, organizations, accountancy firms, and IFAC member bodies and associates may submit nominations for the public member positions by June 22, 2008.

Nominees for the public member positions must have an appropriate level of knowledge about the work of the IAASB, although they need not have a professional accountancy designation. Public members are expected to act in the public interest and must be seen to be independent of any special interests and seen to be acting to represent society as a whole.

The IAASB serves the public interest by setting, independently and under its own authority, high quality international auditing and assurance standards and facilitating convergence to those standards, thereby enhancing the quality and uniformity of practice worldwide and strengthening public confidence in financial reporting. More than 100 countries use or are in the process of adopting or incorporating the IAASB's International Standards on Auditing into their national auditing standards, or are using them as a basis for preparing national auditing standards.

Public members of the IAASB will participate in the development of assurance standards on green house gas emissions and reports on controls at third party service organizations, as well as the development of other new and amended international standards following the IAASB's rigorous due process. Some IAASB members will also be engaged in liaison activities with key regulatory and other organizations, including meetings, presentations and participation in forums and workshops.

For more information about general qualifications for nominees, their responsibilities, and the process for submitting nominations, see the Call for Nominations on IFAC's website.
 
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 157 members and associates in 123 countries and jurisdictions, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce. In addition to setting international auditing and assurance standards through the IAASB, IFAC, through its independent standard-setting boards, sets international ethics, education, and public sector accounting standards. It also issues guidance to encourage high quality performance by professional accountants in business.

Thank you for inviting me to join this very distinguished panel.

Given that this is an audience not primarily made up of accountants, I thought it might be helpful if I spent just a few minutes explaining who the International Federation of Accountants is, and what we do. This will provide some context for the remarks that follow. 

First, IFAC is an organization of professional accountancy institutes. We have 14 members and associates in the Middle East, including two here in Jordan - the Jordanian Association of Certified Public Accountants and the Arab Society of Certified Accountants.  In total we have 157 members and associates spread across 123 countries, representing approximately 2 ½ million accountants. 

As to what IFAC does, a primary function of the organization is to set professional standards.  Most importantly we set, through our International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). We also establish a Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, which is the basis for codes of ethics of our members. The other two areas in which we set standards are education (the International Education Standards) and public sector accounting, where we set International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs). The IPSASs are the equivalent of the International Accounting Standards Board's International Financial Reporting Standards, though the IPSASs apply to governmental organizations not companies. 

In addition, IFAC has activities that support its standard setting role.  In particular, we have a Small and Medium Practices Committee that provides input to the standard-setting bodies (and also to the International Accounting Standards Board) from the perspective of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and small- and medium-sized accounting practices (SMP).  We believe it is critical that this perspective be reflected in our standard-setting processes. Also, we have a Developing Nations Committee which, similarly, seeks to ensure that our standard setting reflects the views and needs of developing and emerging economies.

I should note that in the post-Enron environment, IFAC made significant reforms to its standard-setting processes. These reforms could be characterized as moving from a self-regulatory model to a shared regulatory structure. A number of changes were made to our processes to ensure greater transparency but, most importantly, we established, along with the international regulatory community, an oversight structure that could ensure that our standard setting reflected the public interest. These reforms have now been in place for over three years and have done much to generate confidence in the standards set by the International Federation of Accountants. 

The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) released its 2007 annual report today, highlighting IFAC's progress in achieving international convergence, its expanding role in supporting the profession in developing nations, and its initiatives to enhance the quality of work provided by professional accountants in the public and private sectors. In addition, the report describes IFAC's consultation with and outreach to regulators, standard setters, international development agencies, and other international groups in the development and implementation of its various public interest activities.

"The accomplishments of the past year are the result of a shared vision of IFAC, its members and associates, regional accountancy organizations, and others to strengthen the profession so it can effectively serve the public interest and contribute to economic growth and development worldwide," states IFAC President Fermín del Valle. "The report clearly demonstrates our commitment to transparency and building public trust."

A key feature of the report is the "Service Delivery" section, which describes IFAC services delivered against those planned in five key areas:

• Standards and guidance;
• Promoting quality;
• International collaboration;
• Representation of the accountancy profession in the public interest; and
• Information services.

"For the first time, the Service Delivery section of our annual report was reviewed by IFAC's independent auditor, and it received an unqualified assurance engagement opinion. This assurance statement reflects both our focus on services and our accountability to stakeholders,"states IFAC Chief Executive Officer Ian Ball. "It makes clear that we have delivered what we promised."

In addition to messages from IFAC's President and CEO, the report includes a message from Professor Stavros Thomadakis, Chair of the Public Interest Oversight Board, which oversees IFAC's Public Interest Activity Committees*.

The IFAC 2007 annual report can be downloaded from its website at http://www.ifac.org/About/2007AnnualReport.php. Print copies will be available in early-May and may be obtained by sending an email with your mailing address to pr@ifac.org.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 157 members and associates in 123 countries and jurisdictions, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce. Through its independent standard-setting boards, IFAC sets international standards on ethics, auditing and assurance, education, and public sector accounting. It also issues guidance to encourage high quality performance by professional accountants in business.

* The Public Interest Activity Committees are the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, the International Accounting Education Standards Board, the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants, and the Compliance Advisory Panel, which oversees the IFAC Member Body Compliance Program.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard-setting board under the auspices of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), seeks to fill a key technical manager position.

The IAASB is made up of volunteer members from around the world. The technical manager's key responsibilities will include conducting project research; interacting with national standard setters and IFAC members and associates from various countries; and developing, editing and overseeing publication of IAASB exposure drafts, standards and guidance. Other responsibilities include:

• Drafting project proposals and presenting them to the IAASB and, as appropriate, to task forces;
• Attending IAASB meetings as well as task force meetings, participating in discussions and recording discussions and decisions;
• Preparing IAASB meeting agendas and papers and developing articles and speeches; and
• Assisting the Chairman and Executive Director, Professional Standards in responding to technical and process issues raised by the IAASB Consultative Advisory Group and the Public Interest Oversight Board.*

The ideal candidate for this position will have a professionally recognized accounting degree or other relevant qualification. An excellent knowledge of issues relating to auditing, and experience in the standard-setting process is a plus, as is an understanding of the special considerations relating to the audit of multinational entities, small and medium enterprises or public sector entities.

It is anticipated that the successful applicant will work at IFAC's headquarters in New York City. (About 25 day to 35 days per year of international travel are required.)

A complete job description, including additional information concerning preferred background and experience, is available on the IFAC website. Interested candidates should submit their résumé (CV) by June 20, 2008 to the IFAC Human Resources Manager.

About the IAASB and IFAC
The objective of the IAASB, an independent standard-setting board within IFAC, is to serve the public interest by setting high-quality auditing and assurance standards and by facilitating the convergence of international and national standards, thereby enhancing the quality and uniformity of practice throughout the world and strengthening public confidence in the global auditing and assurance profession. The Public Interest Oversight Board oversees the activities of the IAASB, and, as one element of that oversight, establishes the criteria for its due process and working procedures.

IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 157 members and associates in 123 countries and jurisdictions, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce.  In addition to setting international auditing and assurance standards through the IAASB, IFAC, through its independent standard-setting boards, sets ethics, education, and public sector accounting standards. It also issues guidance to encourage high quality performance by professional accountants in business.

* Note to Editors
The Public Interest Oversight Board (PIOB) was formally established in February 2005 to oversee IFAC's auditing and assurance, ethics, and education standard-setting activities as well as the IFAC Member Body Compliance Program. The objective of the PIOB is to increase confidence of investors and others that such activities, including the setting of standards by the IAASB, are properly responsive to the public interest. PIOB members are nominated by international institutions and regulatory bodies.

The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) has released its 2008 Handbook of International Auditing, Assurance, and Ethics Pronouncements. The handbook can be downloaded in PDF format from the IFAC online bookstore (http://www.ifac.org/store), and print copies can be ordered now for shipment in mid-March. In addition, the 2008 Handbook of International Public Sector Accounting Pronouncements is currently being finalized and will be available for download from the IFAC bookstore later in March.

Auditing and Assurance Handbook
The 2008 auditing and assurance handbook is presented in two parts. The first part contains pronouncements on auditing, review, other assurance, and related services issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) as of January 1, 2008. It also includes the IFAC Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, issued by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants, along with new definitions for "firm," "network," and "network firm." The second part of the handbook features nine International Standards on Auditing redrafted by the IAASB to improve their clarity, as well as background information on the IAASB's Clarity project.

Print copies of the handbook can be ordered for US$150.00 plus shipping. Discounts are available for students, academics, and individuals living in developing countries, as well as for orders of 10 or more copies.

Public Sector Accounting Handbook
The 2008 Handbook of International Public Sector Accounting Pronouncements will contain all pronouncements of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) as of December 31, 2007. It will also feature two new standards - International Public Sector Accounting Standard (IPSAS) 25, Employee Benefits, and IPSAS 26, Impairment of Cash-Generating Assets - as well as an updated Cash-Basis IPSAS, Financial Reporting under the Cash Basis of Accounting. Print copies of the public sector handbook can be ordered for no charge, except for a US$25.00 shipping cost, for shipment in late-March.

How to Order
The 2008 Handbook of International Auditing, Assurance, and Ethics Pronouncements can be downloaded or ordered from the IFAC online bookstore. Orders can also be placed by calling IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 157 members and associates in 123 countries, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce. Through its independent standard-setting boards, IFAC sets international standards on ethics, auditing and assurance, education, and public sector accounting. It also issues guidance to encourage high quality performance by professional accountants in business.

New requirements designed to enhance the rigor applied to auditing accounting estimates, including fair value accounting estimates, were released today by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard-setting board under the auspices of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 540 (Revised and Redrafted), Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures, requires the auditor to focus attention on areas of higher risk, accounting judgment, and possible bias, thereby assisting the auditor to form appropriate conclusions about the reasonableness of estimates in the context of an entity's financial reporting framework.

ISA 540 (Revised and Redrafted) adopts a risk-based approach to the audit of accounting estimates including fair value accounting estimates. It addresses matters such as the auditor's evaluation of the effect of estimation uncertainty on risk assessments, management's methods for making estimates, the reasonableness of assumptions used by management, and the adequacy of disclosures. The ISA provides expanded guidance on auditing fair value accounting estimates, including audit considerations relating to the proper application of the requirements of the financial reporting framework relevant to such estimates and the use of models in valuations.

"We are clearly in an environment where the measurement and disclosure of fair values are of great importance, with recent market experience highlighting the difficulties that arise in valuing financial instruments. It is, therefore, timely that the IAASB has issued its revised standard to provide enhanced guidance on auditing accounting estimates, particularly fair value ones determined on the basis of a complex valuation model or significant unobservable inputs," states John Kellas, Chairman of the IAASB, adding, "We are confident that the standard will enhance current practice and promote consistency worldwide."

ISA 540 (Revised and Redrafted) combines ISA 540 (Revised), Auditing Accounting Estimates and Related Disclosures (Other Than Those Involving Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures), and ISA 545, Auditing Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The IAASB concluded that the similarities between estimates and fair value estimates could be emphasized, and redundancy eliminated, by combining these two standards. The new standard forms part of the IAASB's ambitious 18-month program to redraft existing standards and to develop new and revised standards following the clarity drafting conventions.¹

Mr. Kellas explains: "Although ISA 540 (Revised and Redrafted) is effective for audits of financial periods commencing on or after December 15, 2009, the date when all the standards redrafted under the IAASB's Clarity project become effective, it deals with a subject of considerable current concern. In this climate, auditors will be well aware of the need to understand the accounting principles and rules relating to accounting on the basis of fair value, and to give appropriate consideration to their application. Auditors may therefore wish to consider the material in the new standard as they complete their 2007 audits, and plan and perform those for 2008 and 2009 engagements. Other existing standards may also be particularly relevant, for example, those on the use of experts by the auditor and on the auditor's consideration of the going concern basis of accounting."

The IAASB also recommends that auditors be alert for relevant guidance that has been, or may be, issued by other organizations: for example, the paper, Determining Fair Value of Financial Instruments under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Current Market Conditions, issued in December 2007 by the world's six largest accounting firms (under the auspices of the Global Public Policy Committee); the US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's Staff Audit Practice Alert No. 2, Matters Related to Auditing Fair Value Measurements of Financial Instruments and the Use of Specialists, also released in December; and the UK Auditing Practices Board's (APB) Bulletin 2008/01, Audit Issues when Financial Market Conditions are Difficult and Credit Facilities may be Restricted.

ISA 540 (Revised and Redrafted) can be downloaded free-of-charge from the IFAC online bookstore at http://www.ifac.org/store.

Task Force on Fair Value Auditing Guidance
To address some of the valuation difficulties highlighted by the problems in the world's major financial markets, the IAASB plans to explore whether and how to supplement ISA 540 (Revised and Redrafted) as soon as practicable with implementation guidance on auditing fair value estimates. Any such guidance would have the aim of raising awareness of issues and best practice on a timely basis and further promoting audit consistency. Accordingly, the IAASB agreed in December 2007 to establish a Task Force to consider how best to approach the development of possible further fair value auditing guidance.

The demand for implementation guidance from a number of constituencies, including regulators, was recognized in the IAASB Consultation Paper, Proposed Strategy for 2009-2011. That paper raised the possibility that the IAASB might develop guidance for auditors on the audit of complex valuation models. However, recent developments in the financial markets, in particular the current lack of market liquidity, have persuaded the IAASB to create the Task Force now to take this idea further even though the responses to the Consultation Paper have yet to be fully analyzed.

The Task Force, chaired by a member of the IAASB and to comprise interested parties with relevant perspectives and expertise, will consider aspects of the audit of financial statement items measured at fair value and make recommendations to the IAASB for matters that require priority attention.

About the IAASB and IFAC
The objective of the IAASB is to serve the public interest by setting high quality auditing and assurance standards and by facilitating the convergence of international and national standards, thereby enhancing the quality and uniformity of practice throughout the world and strengthening public confidence in the global auditing and assurance profession. The Public Interest Oversight Board oversees the activities of the IAASB and, as one element of that oversight, establishes its due process and working procedures.

IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 157 members and associates in 123 countries and jurisdictions, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce. In addition to setting international auditing and assurance standards through the IAASB, IFAC, through its independent standard-setting boards, sets international ethics, education, and public sector accounting standards. It also issues guidance to encourage high quality performance by professional accountants in business.

¹Key elements of the clarity drafting conventions include: establishing an objective for the auditor with respect to the subject matter of each standard; clearly distinguishing requirements from guidance on their application; avoiding ambiguity through eliminating the present tense to describe actions by the auditor and using more imperative language where a requirement was intended; and other structural and drafting improvements to enhance the overall readability and understandability of the standards.