This article presents the rationale for small businesses to improve their environmental performance and highlights the role that small- and medium-sized practices (SMPs) have in this emerging area of business advisory services.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) today released a Feedback Statement on the responses to its January 2011 Discussion Paper, The Evolving Nature of Financial Reporting: Disclosure and Its Audit Implications. The Discussion Paper solicited views and perspectives of different stakeholder groups on the challenges arising as financial reporting continues to evolve to meet the changing needs of users. Respondents from across the world, including regulators and oversight authorities, users and preparers, audit firms, and professional bodies provided thoughtful and informative input on issues around disclosures. The Feedback Statement provides an overview of the key messages heard and provides thoughts and recommendations on what can be done to address them.

“Disclosures have always been a critical component of financial reporting, but have become more so today as reporting increasingly incorporates fair value information, estimates involving judgment and complex measurements, and narrative disclosures of some of the risks and characteristics of companies and groups. Accordingly, investors and others look to disclosures for vital insights when making investment decisions,” said Prof. Arnold Schilder, Chairman of the IAASB. “This underscores the importance of the IAASB’s initiative to gain further knowledge and understanding of the issues and share what it has heard to stimulate further thinking and exploration in this area.”

The Feedback Statement presents a summary of the range of views on some of the more significant challenges faced by participants across the entire financial reporting supply chain, including the impact of trends in financial reporting, applying materiality to disclosures, evaluating misstatements generated by disclosures, the availability of audit evidence to support disclosures, and work effort. To address some of the issues identified respondents have called for more auditing guidance in certain identified areas. However, the majority of the respondents were of the view that some of the more important issues could not be addressed by the IAASB on its own, but would require international collaboration and cooperation, particularly with both the accounting standard setters—including the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)—and regulators.

“Financial information that is reliable, understandable, and relevant is essential, as is the assurance on that information that auditors provide. We wholeheartedly agree with the respondents regarding the need for international collaboration and cooperation among standard setters; securities, audit, and prudential regulators; and other stakeholders. We must work together to develop effective responses to the issues being faced today,” notes James Gunn, IAASB Technical Director.  “Like others, the IAASB has a role in enhancing the public’s confidence in disclosures as a priority—recognizing that individual initiatives must be towards finding a collective solution.”

About the IAASB
The IAASB develops auditing and assurance standards and guidance for use by all professional accountants under a shared standard-setting process involving the Public Interest Oversight Board, which oversees the activities of the IAASB, and the IAASB Consultative Advisory Group, which provides public interest input into the development of the standards and guidance. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IAASB are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 167 members and associates in 127 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#  #  #

This Feedback Statement provides an overview of the key messages from the responses to the IAASB’s January 2011 Discussion Paper, The Evolving Nature of Financial Reporting: Disclosure and Its Audit Implications.

This summary is intended to be a resource to aid users in gaining a quick overview and understanding of the range of prohibitions imposed by the Code on professional accountants when they undertake audits of PIEs. It is intended to help facilitate the adoption and effective implementation of the Code by IFAC member bodies and others.

This publication does not constitute an authoritative pronouncements of the board, nor does it amend or override the Code.

(New York, December 28, 2011)—The global economy continues to experience difficult conditions as the effects of the financial crisis—for example, on corporate cash flows and access to credit—persist. Volatility in capital markets, and issues including measurement and disclosure of exposures to sovereign debt of distressed countries, continue to create uncertainty. The impact of these issues and uncertainty has wide-ranging financial reporting implications that often extend beyond national borders.

These and other current economic conditions present unique challenges for management of entities, those charged with governance, and auditors in meeting their responsibilities, including assessing an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and making relevant disclosures in the financial statements and, as appropriate, the auditor’s report.

In light of the current environment, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) reminds auditors of their important responsibilities under the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and that the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern assumption is a matter to be considered on every audit engagement.

Prof. Arnold Schilder, Chairman of the IAASB, commented, “Difficult economic conditions give rise to many important audit considerations, but none more important—or more difficult—than evaluating management’s assessment of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and determining the appropriate auditor reporting in the circumstances.”

“Auditors must remain alert throughout the audit for evidence of events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. We cannot stress enough the importance of professional skepticism and judgment in evaluating financial statement disclosures and the implications for the auditor’s report when a material uncertainty exists relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.”

The 2009 IAASB Staff Audit Practice Alert, “Audit Considerations in Respect of Going Concern in the Current Economic Environment,” highlights matters relevant to the consideration of the going concern assumption in the preparation of financial statements. Among other matters, it addresses factors relevant to the assessment of going concern; the period of time considered in making a going concern assessment; financial statement disclosures; forming an opinion on the financial statements and the implications for the auditor’s report.

“While this Audit Practice Alert was released in context of the 2008-2009 credit crisis, many of the matters addressed in it are equally relevant today. For example, an entity may be experiencing a decline in its financial health, or may have material uncertainties arising from direct or indirect exposures to sovereign debt of distressed countries. Auditors are therefore encouraged to review the Alert and, importantly, the relevant requirements in the ISAs,” emphasized Prof. Schilder.

About the IAASB

The IAASB develops auditing and assurance standards and guidance for use by all professional accountants under a shared standard-setting process involving the Public Interest Oversight Board, which oversees the activities of the IAASB, and the IAASB Consultative Advisory Group, which provides public interest input into the development of the standards and guidance. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IAASB are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC

IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 167 members and associates in 127 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#     #     #

Recognizing the need for reliable information in domestic and cross-border securities offerings and other fundraising activities, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) today released new International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3420, Assurance Engagements to Report on the Compilation of Pro Forma Financial Information Included in a Prospectus.

Companies seeking to access capital markets commonly include pro forma financial information in their prospectuses as a key element to enable investors and others to better assess the investment opportunities presented. Pro forma financial information included in an issuer’s prospectus illustrates the impact of a proposed acquisition, equity or debt issuance, or other transactions on the issuer’s historical financial information as if such event or transaction had occurred at an earlier selected date.

“Pro forma financial information included in prospectuses plays an important role in informing the public’s investment decisions in today’s increasingly global capital markets. Enhancing public confidence in how such financial information has been produced is therefore especially important,” said Prof. Arnold Schilder, Chairman of the IAASB. “The IAASB is confident that this new standard will help meet the public interest need for harmonized practices internationally in this area,” Prof. Schilder added.

The new ISAE 3420 provides comprehensive guidance on the nature and extent of a practitioner’s work when engaged to report on the compilation of pro forma financial information. Among other matters, it establishes minimum benchmarks for suitable criteria for the compilation of such information. It also covers related engagement acceptance and reporting considerations. ISAE 3420 is effective for assurance reports dated on or after March 31, 2013.

About the IAASB
The IAASB develops auditing and assurance standards and guidance for use by all professional accountants under a shared standard-setting process involving the Public Interest Oversight Board, which oversees the activities of the IAASB, and the IAASB Consultative Advisory Group, which provides public interest input into the development of the standards and guidance. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IAASB are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 167 members and associates in 127 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#              #              #

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is proposing changes to its Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (the IESBA Code) to provide additional guidance to professional accountants in business and in public practice concerning conflicts of interest, and to make revisions to provide more comprehensive guidance in identifying, evaluating, and managing conflicts of interest.

The IESBA approved this project in October 2009.  It examined two sections of the IESBA Code that address conflicts—Section 220, for professional accountants in public practice, and Section 310, for professional accountants in business. In the IESBA’s view, the approach to be taken by a professional accountant in public practice and a professional accountant in business should be broadly similar.  The proposal recognizes, however, that conflicts of interest will typically arise in different circumstances for accountants in public practice, particularly because a conflict of interest may arise from professional services provided by other members of the accountant's firm.

Ken Dakdduk, IESBA Chair, notes, “The proposed changes will provide more specific requirements and guidance for a professional accountant in applying the conceptual framework when identifying, evaluating, and managing conflicts of interest. This includes a clearer description of what is meant under the IESBA Code by the term ‘conflict of interest.’ The changes should assist professional accountants in early identification of a potential conflict of interest, and prompt accountants to evaluate their ability to be objective in that situation and meet the other fundamental principles in the IESBA Code.  From the perspective of the public, timely identification of potential conflicts of interest can provide affected parties with more time to engage an alternative service provider.”

The proposed guidance also calls for professional accountants in business to be alert to interests and relationships that a reasonable and informed third party would be likely to conclude might compromise compliance with the fundamental principles. Further, the IESBA proposal would strengthen the guidance on threats created by compensation and incentive arrangements.

How to comment
The IESBA invites all stakeholders to comment on its proposals. To access the exposure draft and submit a comment, visit the IESBA website at www.ethicsboard.org. Comments on the exposure draft Proposed Changes to the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants Addressing Conflicts of Interest are requested by March 31, 2012.

About the IESBA
The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is an independent standard-setting board that develops and issues, in the public interest, high-quality ethical standards and other pronouncements for professional accountants worldwide. Through its activities, the IESBA develops the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, which establishes ethical requirements for professional accountants. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IESBA are facilitated by IFAC. Please visit www.ethicsboard.org for more information.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 167 members and associates in 127 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) today released International Auditing Practice Note (IAPN) 1000, Special Considerations in Auditing Financial Instruments, to provide important practical assistance to auditors when addressing valuation and other considerations pertaining to financial instruments. Financial instruments is an area of financial reporting involving complex issues and which has come under particular focus due to the recent difficult financial market conditions.

“The IAASB remains focused on supporting financial stability and high-quality financial reporting by continuing to help enhance the consistency of audits.  Accordingly, IAPN 1000 provides important material that will assist auditors in understanding the nature of, and risks associated with, financial instruments, and the different valuation techniques and types of controls that may be used by entities in relation to them. It then highlights important audit considerations that may be relevant throughout the audit process,” noted Prof. Arnold Schilder, IAASB Chairman. “The IAPN is relevant to audits of entities of all sizes, as all entities may be subject to risks of material misstatement when using financial instruments.”

IAPNs are non-authoritative documents that do not impose additional requirements on auditors beyond those included in the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs), nor do they change the auditor’s responsibility to comply with all ISAs relevant to the audit. In finalizing IAPN 1000, and in response to stakeholder concerns, the IAASB evaluated the clarity and appropriateness of the authority of the existing International Auditing Practice Statements (IAPSs). The IAASB decided to withdraw the existing category of pronouncements known as IAPSs and to establish IAPNs, as reflected in the amended Preface to the International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements. Accordingly, the six existing IAPSs were also withdrawn as the IAASB determined that they were largely outdated and inconsistent with the text of the clarified ISAs. “The IAASB will be considering in its forward plans matters covered in some of the extant IAPSs, for example the relationship between auditors and banking supervisors, as it develops standards, new IAPNs, or other forms of guidance in the future,” commented Prof. Schilder.

“The IAASB understands that the quality and consistency of audit practice is helped not only through new standards but by other tools that can be used in developing training programs, internal guidance or corresponding national material. New IAPN 1000 helps serve this aim,” explained James Gunn, IAASB Technical Director. “In developing this practical guidance, the IAASB itself gained a deeper understanding of the challenges in this complex area, which will be used to further inform its future work.”

About the IAASB
The IAASB develops auditing and assurance standards and guidance for use by all professional accountants under a shared standard-setting process involving the Public Interest Oversight Board, which oversees the activities of the IAASB, and the IAASB Consultative Advisory Group, which provides public interest input into the development of the standards and guidance. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IAASB are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 167 members and associates in 127 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#          #          #