These Improvements to International Public Sector Accounting Standards were prepared by the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB).

(New York/October 26, 2011) – Burden of regulation continues to challenge both accountants and their small business clients, according to the small- and medium-sized accountancy practitioners polled by the International Federation of Accountants in August–September. Despite these challenges, overall optimism increased since the last SMP Quick Poll was conducted; nearly 40% of practitioners expect business to be better this year than it was last year, compared to just 23% in April. 

While more small practices are now offering business advisory services, the poll results showed that traditional accountancy-based services continue to generate the largest portion of SMPs’ fee revenue: accounting and compilation averaged 38% of total fee revenue, with audit and assurance close behind with an average of 35%. Accounting and compilation is also the fastest growing source of revenue for the largest group of respondents (34%), followed by audit and assurance (26%).

There are challenges to expanding into business advisory, which may explain why only 23% of respondents indicated that this area is their fastest growing source of revenue. According to respondents, insufficient partner time (30%) and marketing services to clients (29%) are the biggest challenges to expansion in this area. New advisory/consulting clients are driven primarily by existing customer-client relationships (37%), followed by practitioners’ competence and expertise (21%). When asked to indicate how fee revenue is split among the various areas of advisory/consulting, tax consulting came out highest with an average of 45% of consulting fee revenue.

With the aim of taking a snapshot of the key issues confronted by SMPs and their SME clients, the IFAC SMP Quick Poll is being conducted quarterly throughout 2011 with distribution via the SMP eNews, IFAC’s free newsletter for SMPs, and support from our member bodies. The third SMP Quick Poll collected 798 responses from all regions of the world over a 32-day period (August 8, 2011 to September 9, 2011). To subscribe to the SMP eNews, and participate in our next poll, sign up here.

IFAC wishes to thank those member bodies and regional organizations that published the poll in their newsletters, or otherwise helped promote it. The full survey results are available here.

About the SMP Committee
The SMP Committee of the International Federation of Accountants represents the interests of professional accountants operating in small- and medium-sized practices and other professional accountants who provide services to small- and medium-sized entities (SMEs). The committee develops guidance and tools, and works to ensure the needs of the SMP and SME sectors are considered by standard setters, regulators, and policy makers. The committee also speaks out on behalf of SMPs to raise awareness of their role and value, especially in supporting SMEs, and the importance of the small business sector overall.

About IFAC     
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession, dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. It is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#   #   #

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) today released its plan for a post-implementation review of the clarified International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). In 2009 the IAASB concluded its five-year Clarity project to redraft and revise the ISAs. The post-implementation review is the second phase of the IAASB’s efforts to monitor the implementation of these standards. The review is focused on whether the clarified ISAs are being consistently understood and implemented in a way that achieves the IAASB’s goals in revising and redrafting them.

“With extensive uptake of the clarified ISAs throughout the world, in already more than seventy-five countries, now is the time to gain a deeper understanding of how the clarified ISAs are being used and implemented,” said Prof. Arnold Schilder, Chairman of the IAASB. “When this review is completed in 2013, the IAASB will be better able to assess whether there is need for further changes to the ISAs. Timely feedback on the clarified ISAs from a variety of stakeholders is therefore essential for this purpose and the IAASB’s objective of ensuring that its standards continue to be of the highest quality.”

Features of the post-implementation review, which involves gathering information about the use of the clarified ISAs during 2012, are set out in the IAASB’s Plan for a Post-Implementation Review of the Clarified International Standards on Auditing.

Recognizing the broad range of stakeholders that may be interested in providing feedback to the IAASB about the clarified ISAs and their implementation, the IAASB encourages and welcomes input from all interested parties for the purpose of the review.

How to Comment

To access the plan and details on how to provide input, visit the IAASB’s website. Input for the purpose of the review is requested by no later than October 31, 2012.

About the IAASB
The IAASB develops auditing and assurance standards and guidance for use by all professional accountants under a shared standard-setting process involving the Public Interest Oversight Board, which oversees the activities of the IAASB, and the IAASB Consultative Advisory Group, which provides public interest input into the development of the standards and guidance. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IAASB are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#       #       #

This plan is the second phase of the IAASB’s efforts to monitor the implementation of clarified ISAs. The review is focused on whether these standards are being consistently understood and implemented in a way that achieves the IAASB’s goals in revising and redrafting them. Recognizing the broad range of stakeholders that may be interested in providing feedback to the IAASB about the clarified ISAs and their implementation, the IAASB encourages and welcomes input from all interested parties for the purpose of the review.

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) today released for exposure  Proposed Changes to the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants Related to Provisions Addressing a Breach of a Requirement of the Code. The IESBA believes that any breach of a provision of the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code) should be treated as a matter of utmost importance. Therefore, the IESBA has proposed changes to the IESBA Code that will provide guidance to a professional accountant on the action to be taken in such situations. This includes a robust framework for addressing a breach of an independence requirement that will result in greater transparency. This Exposure Draft is the result of a project that commenced in 2010.*

The proposed changes to the IESBA Code include a requirement that a professional accountant take whatever actions that might be available as soon as possible to satisfactorily address the consequences of a breach of a provision of the Code.  For a breach of an independence requirement in the IESBA Code, a detailed framework is provided setting out the action to be taken. Specifically, the proposed changes would require a firm to:

• terminate, suspend, or eliminate the interest or relationship that caused the breach;
• evaluate the significance of the breach and determine whether action can be taken to satisfactorily address the consequences of the breach;
• communicate all breaches with those charged with governance and obtain their agreement with the proposed course of action; and
• document the actions taken and all the matters discussed with those charged with governance and, if applicable, any relevant regulators.

“The proposed changes to the IESBA Code should help to ensure that the significance of any breach of an independence requirement is discussed with those charged with governance, and that professional judgment is taken into account when taking action,” stated Ken Dakdduk, IESBA Chair. “An auditor resignation due to an independence violation—regardless of the magnitude of the violation—has potential consequences to the company, its investors, and the capital markets.  The proposed framework will guide accountants, and those charged with governance, in determining whether resignation is an appropriate outcome or whether a different outcome can be supported. In addition, disclosure will enhance transparency, and the proposed documentation requirement adds a degree of rigor to the process that will be very useful.”

How to Comment
The IESBA invites all stakeholders to comment on its proposals. To access the exposure draft and submit a comment, visit the IESBA’s website at www.ifac.org/Ethics/publications-resources. Comments on the exposure draft are requested by January 23, 2012.

*Note to Editors:
In 2010, the IESBA assessed the provisions in the IESBA Code that address a breach of an independence requirement, and concluded that a project should be undertaken to reconsider those provisions, including determining whether the provisions are needed and, if so, how the guidance can be enhanced with regard to scope and application. As a result of this project, the IESBA concluded that it is in the public interest to have an appropriate mechanism that can be consistently applied across all jurisdictions in order to provide companies, auditors, regulators, and similar authorities with a framework to evaluate the impact of an independence violation and determine whether the auditor's resignation is the only appropriate outcome.

About the IESBA
The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is an independent standard-setting board that develops and issues, in the public interest, high-quality ethical standards and other pronouncements for professional accountants worldwide. Through its activities, the IESBA develops the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, which establishes ethical requirements for professional accountants. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IESBA are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession, dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. It is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#       #       #

The IPSASB has approved the Consultation Paper Reporting Service Performance Information. The IPSASB considers that reporting service performance information is necessary to meet the objectives of financial reporting, which are to provide information that is useful to users of General Purpose Financial Reports (GPFR) for accountability and decision making. This project aims to present a principles-based approach to developing a consistent framework for public sector entities.

IPSASB Chair Andreas Bergmann stressed, “Service performance information is essential for accountability for the efficient and effective use of resources, service provision, and achievement public sector entities’ objectives. Service performance reporting can provide financial and non-financial, as well as quantitative and qualitative, information about the achievement of service delivery objectives in the current reporting period, as well as anticipated future service delivery activities and resource needs.”

Various public sector entities around the world currently report service performance information. In practice, such reporting is diverse. The objective of the IPSASB’s service performance information project has been to improve the consistency and comparability of such information across jurisdictions and between entities.

Overall, the Consultation Paper proposes a framework for reporting service performance information. The framework includes information on the scope of the service performance information reported, the public sector entity’s objectives, the achievement of those objectives, and a narrative discussion of the achievement of all the objectives. The Consultation Paper also proposes a standardized service performance information terminology and working definitions to enhance users’ understanding of service performance information reported as outlined in the proposed framework.

The Consultation Paper is available to download free of charge from the IPSASB website (www.ipsasb.org). The IPSASB encourages IFAC members, associates, and regional accountancy bodies to promote the availability of this consultation paper to their members and employees.  

About the IPSASB
The IPSASB develops accounting standards and guidance for use by public sector entities. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IPSASB are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession, dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. It is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#    #    #

The International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) has published Exposure Draft (ED) 46, Recommended Practice Guideline. This ED builds on a consultation paper issued in late 2009. ED 46 provides good practice guidelines on reporting on the long-term fiscal sustainability of a public sector entity, and particularly emphasizes that entities may be able to draw on projections that are already being made by other bodies, thereby ensuring a cost-effective approach.

The sovereign debt crisis has emphasized the significance of the fiscal condition of governments and other public sector entities to the global economy. There have been heightened concerns about the ability of governments to meet debt servicing obligations and the extent to which they can maintain current policies and meet current and future obligations related to entitlement programs, without raising taxes and contributions or increasing debt to unsustainable levels.

These concerns have emphasized the importance of providing projections of inflows and outflows of resources over the longer term, together with narrative explanations of the main risks facing governments and other public sector entities. This information allows the users of general purpose financial reports to assess the extent to which current policies are sustainable, and complements the financial statements, which remain at the core of public sector financial reporting.

“The continuing volatility in the world’s financial markets has reinforced the IPSASB’s conviction that  financial statements alone cannot provide all the information necessary to enable citizens, investors, and other users to evaluate the long-term fiscal sustainability of governments and public sector entities,” explained Andreas Bergmann, chair of the IPSASB. “ED 46 aims to provide straightforward guidance to entities to ensure that information on their fiscal sustainability is complete, relevant, and understandable. I encourage our constituents to give this ED full consideration, provide feedback, and assess the need to report on the long-term sustainability of their finances.”

This IPSASB project has continued to benefit greatly from the oversight of a Task Force with a wide membership, including standard setters with experience reporting on long-term fiscal sustainability, governments that have many years’ experience reporting on long-term fiscal sustainability, and supranational organizations, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union.

ED 46 is available to download free of charge from the IFAC website (www.ipsasb.org). The IPSASB encourages IFAC members, associates, and regional accountancy bodies to promote the availability of this Exposure Draft to their members and employees.  

About the IPSASB
The IPSASB develops accounting standards and guidance for use by public sector entities. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IPSASB are facilitated by IFAC.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession, dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. It is comprised of 164 members and associates in 125 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#          #          #